Oh man, i missed that in the long-winded survey-babble crap. ickickugh. if they said genderqueer they might possibly not have defeated the supposed purpose of their paper...
i was looking for neuropsych stuff at the time, saw the "find and replace with multiple interpretations" and though "hey, cool, not check boxes!" *sigh* that'll teach me to skip over the poorly-written jargon.
no subject
i was looking for neuropsych stuff at the time, saw the "find and replace with multiple interpretations" and though "hey, cool, not check boxes!" *sigh* that'll teach me to skip over the poorly-written jargon.