ext_120882 ([identity profile] sylvanstargazer.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rax 2009-12-19 05:51 am (UTC)

Oh man, i missed that in the long-winded survey-babble crap. ickickugh. if they said genderqueer they might possibly not have defeated the supposed purpose of their paper...

i was looking for neuropsych stuff at the time, saw the "find and replace with multiple interpretations" and though "hey, cool, not check boxes!" *sigh* that'll teach me to skip over the poorly-written jargon.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting