ext_165656 ([identity profile] halfelf.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] rax 2010-11-08 02:10 am (UTC)

As I have been going through classes recently because we're having a baby, the question of circumcision has come up quite a few times. I am amazed that in this day and age, this procedure is still performed, and what's more, according to the documentation we've been shown at the birthing class, has "possible health benefits" and is "recommended". I honestly agree that FGM and circumcision are not inherently different - both have many roots in religious beliefs, and at their basis, are both mutilation of genitalia. Luckily, circumcision rates in recent years have plummeted, lessening the 'peer pressure' effect. It was even suggested that a valid reason to have a boy circumcised was so that 'he could fit in better in the shower room' and avoid teasing!

Honestly, I'm glad I'm able to sidestep this entirely, as we're having a girl, but even if I had to deal with it, everyone that matters agree with me, and that's all that's important. :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting